When did Captain Cook land in Australia? And did any changes in the International Date Line lead to a change in dates in Australia?

When did Captain Cook land in Australia? And did any changes in the International Date Line lead to a change in dates in Australia?

Published by Nick Lomb on October 20, 2011 9 Comments

Captain Cook Monument_Kurnell_PHM

Captain Cook’s Monument at Kurnell in Sydney photographed by the Sydney firm of Charles Kerry & Co, probably between 1892 and 1917. The plaque on the monument states that Captain Cook’s landing at Botany Bay was on 28 April 1770. Is this correct? Image courtesy of Powerhouse Museum

Mary asks

Cook in 1770 sailed around the South Pacific, after having taken the observations of the Eclipse etc… So at some stage during those several years of sailing, he was technically on the eastern side of the IDL and at other times he was on the western side.

His log book does not seem to make adjustments for the changing back and forth across the IDL. He sailed from London, down around Sth America and then into the Pacific.

So, my fundamental question is : When his log records the date as say 28 April 1770 (he was in Botany Bay) what was the actual date …. 28th April 1770 or 29th April 1770.

I am trying to find out WHEN the IDL was introduced to the NSW Calendar. I realise that in 1770, it was not yet drawn on maps etc. I believe it was ‘invented’ in the 1840′s.

I am trying to sort out in my own way …. if my relatives born and raised in NSW in the early part of the 19th C, ie when Gov Macquarie ruled (1810-1821) experienced any adjustment to their calendar during their lifetime…. Or if that happened during the life of their children or their grandchildren etc etc etc. … Or perhaps it was an adjustment made to the calendars of those on the EASTERN side of the IDL ….

Answer
As any Australians who have travelled to the United States would be aware, when crossing the International Date Line (IDL) flying east we gain a day and on the return journey flying west we lose a day. Officially the IDL came into existence after the conference in Washington DC in October 1884 that agreed on Greenwich in the UK as the zero longitude. As a consequence the IDL was 180° from Greenwich, across the Pacific Ocean. However, British seamen had been using charts based on Greenwich from the late 1700s and so for them there was no change in the location of the IDL after the Washington Conference.

Like other Royal Navy captains of his time, Cook did not take the IDL into account when recording dates, even when sailing west across the Pacific. An extra complication in interpreting dates in his log is that he was using nautical time that began at noon and was 12 hours ahead of the civil day. Thus in his journal he recorded his landing at Botany Bay on the afternoon of Sunday 29 April 1770. In civil time that was the afternoon of 28 April and that is the time inscribed on the Captain Cook monument at Kurnell. However, as Cook did not add the extra day on crossing the IDL it is now usual to correct his date to 29 April. These messy corrections are discussed in authoritative detail on the Canadian Archives & Collections Society website.

Fortunately, Captain Phillip’s First Fleet sailed eastwards to Australia without crossing the IDL and hence there was no ambiguity about the dates that he introduced to his infant Colony. In any case, the astronomer with the First Fleet, Lieutenant William Dawes, recorded the longitude of Sydney in the modern fashion of 10 hours 5 minutes and 24 seconds east of Greenwich, so that he was clearly aware that the Colony was on the west side of the IDL.

Any changes to the IDL by other countries, such as the Philippines that moved itself from the east side of the IDL to the west at the end of 1844, had no effect on the people of NSW. Neither do changes by Samoa that will occur at the end of 2011. Since the arrival of the First Fleet they knew which side of the Date Line they were on and had no need to make any shifts in the calendar dates.

Mary, you can rest easy, whatever hardships your ancestors experienced in New South Wales in the time of Governor Macquarie, having to lose a day due a shift in the location of the International Date Line was not one of them.

Leave a Reply

9 Responses to “When did Captain Cook land in Australia? And did any changes in the International Date Line lead to a change in dates in Australia?”

  1. March 18, 2014 at 2:44 pm, ryan smaling said:

    hay people you know captain james cook is a really good person to learn about o think he is cool because he faid astrala

    Reply

  2. January 04, 2014 at 11:03 am, Ben said:

    Good website
    Very handy for homework

    Reply

    • January 05, 2014 at 1:51 pm, Nick Lomb said:

      Thanks Ben. I am pleased to hear that. We try to be a reliable source of interesting and useful information.

      Reply

  3. May 22, 2013 at 1:48 pm, Ruby said:

    Captain Cook was a big jerk! He could see that the land was taken a he still invaded Australia! I can’t believe he put the aboriginals under flora and fauna!

    Reply

  4. March 29, 2013 at 3:58 pm, Gabrielle said:

    I believe captin cook found Australia on the 26th of January 1780.

    Reply

    • March 30, 2013 at 9:25 pm, Nick Lomb said:

      Hello Gabrielle. You are thinking of the First Fleet commanded by Captain Arthur Phillip that landed at Sydney Cove on 26 January 1788.

      Reply

  5. October 22, 2011 at 11:18 am, Andrew James said:

    I thought Cook corrected the calendar date when he arrived in Batavia (‘first’ civilisation) on the 11th October 1770, where he stopped to repair the Endeavour (for ten weeks) after nearly shipwrecking it on Endeavour Reef in now  northern Queensland. He says he reached South Africa on the 14th March which was the same date as Greenwich.
    To me the 29th April is incorrect as the dateline issue did not exist in Cook’s time. The problem would have been quite obvious using the astronomical almanac (ephemeris) (Cook  called; “Nautical Almanack and Astronomical Ephemeras”), whose predictions of the moon phases or Jupiter’s transits and occultations of his moons, would have been out by a day. Clearly from his logged observation (below), the longitude measured is +180 degrees, meaning the ‘time’ was ALWAYS based on the same time at GreenwichSaturday, 21st April 1770. (Three days after sighting land again.);“The shore under the foot of the Mountain forms a point, which I have named Cape Dromedary, over which is a peaked hillock. At this time found the Variation to be 10° 42′ E. Between 10 and 11 o’Clock Mr. Green and I took several Observations of the Sun and Moon, the mean result of which gave 209° 17′ W. Longitude from the Meridian of Greenwich. By observations made yesterday we were in the Longitude 210° 9′. West 20′ gives 209° 49′ the Longitude of the Ship today at noon per yesterday’s observation, the Mean of which and to-day’s give 209° 33′ W., by which I fix the Longitude of this Coast. Our Latitude at Noon was 35° 49′ S.; Cape Dromedary bore S. 30° W., distant 12 Leagues. An Open Bay wherein lay 3 or 4 Small Islands, bore N.W. by W., distant 5 or 6 Leagues. This Bay seem’d to be but very little Shelter’d from the Sea Winds, and yet it is the only likely Anchoring place I have yet seen upon the Coast.”Cook was using an early kind of Universal time, then, where at midnight at Greenwich, the whole world changed day on the calendar. This only changed in 1840s to the use of the dateline. That is the way I see it.Interesting story and problem though.Note: My on-line article “The Dawn of Australian Astronomy” [ http://homepage.mac.com/andjames/Page031a.htm ] I deliberately avoided stating the landing date of Cook at Kurnell for this very reason!

    Reply

    • October 25, 2011 at 4:47 pm, Anonymous said:

      Thanks Andrew for your thoughtful and detailed comments. As you indicate Cook considered that he was around 209° west of Greenwich when he reached the Australian coastline. That is equivalent to being 14 hours behind London time. The important point is that to convert to time in London, or more precisely to Greenwich Civil Time, Cook would have added 14 hours while we would add a day and subtract 10 hours and reach exactly the same answer.

      Whether Cook in 1770 was familiar with the concept of an International Date Line is unclear, but according to the Canadian Archives & Collections Society website, by his second voyage of 1772-75 the charts by the master of the Resolution, James Gilbert, went from 0° to 180° E. and W. of Greenwich.

      Reply

  6. October 20, 2011 at 5:10 pm, Roberto said:

    A very interesting article. Thanks.

    Reply

Search

About

The 'Observations' blog is run by the staff of Sydney Observatory which is located at Observatory Hill, The Rocks, in Sydney, Australia.

This site is for discussion purposes only and does not represent the official views of Sydney Observatory. Any views expressed on this website are those of the individual post author only. Sydney Observatory accepts no liability for the content of this site.

Please direct any correspondence about the content of the blog to:
observatory [at] phm.gov.au
and about web matters to:
web [at] phm.gov.au.